State of West Bengal vs KENARAM BHUIYA — 5618/2012

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304A. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Gr Case

CNR: WBNP150042892012

Filing Number

5618/2012

Filing Date

18-Jan-2020

Registration No

5618/2012

Registration Date

18-Jan-2020

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore, North 24 Pgs.

Judge

8-Acjm

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

552

Police Station

BELGHORIA

Year

2012

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 304A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

    Adv. A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KENARAM BHUIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Summary of Case 5618/2012 Court's Decision: Kenaram Bhuia was acquitted of charges under Section 304A IPC (causing death by negligence). The court found the prosecution failed to establish its case, noting: no eyewitnesses to the factory accident that killed the complainant's brother, no expert evidence of negligence, and significant inconsistencies between the written complaint and trial testimony. The Assistant Public Prosecutor conceded guilt was not proven, and the court held essential ingredients for conviction were absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Acjm

  5. 01-Dec-2025

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    Acjm

  6. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  7. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  8. 03-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  9. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  10. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Acjm

  12. 28-Nov-2024

    Order

  13. 28-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 05-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm

  15. 30-Jul-2024

    Order

  16. 30-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 29-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 26-Jul-2024

    Order

  19. 26-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 25-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 22-Apr-2024

    Order

  22. 22-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 20-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 09-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 07-Oct-2023

    Order

  26. 07-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 18-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 17-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm

  29. 16-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm

  30. 03-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm

  31. 02-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm

  32. 01-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm

  33. 30-May-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm

  34. 20-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm

  35. 16-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Acjm

  36. 02-Sep-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Acjm

  37. 25-Aug-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Acjm

  38. 15-Jul-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Acjm

  39. 15-Jun-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

  40. 07-May-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

  41. 26-Apr-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

  42. 05-Apr-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

  43. 06-Jan-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

  44. 12-Nov-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Acjm

  45. 16-Sep-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Acjm

  46. 14-Jun-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Acjm

  47. 23-Apr-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Acjm

  48. 19-Mar-2021

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Acjm

  49. 24-Apr-2020

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    Acjm

  50. 12-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 18-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5618/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 5618/2012 Court's Decision: Kenaram Bhuia was acquitted of charges under Section 304A IPC (causing death by negligence). The court found the prosecution failed to establish its case, noting: no eyewitnesses to the factory accident that killed the complainant's brother, no expert evidence of negligence, and significant inconsistencies between the written complaint and trial testimony. The Assistant Public Prosecutor conceded guilt was not proven, and the court held essential ingredients for conviction were absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case