State of West Bengal vs GOPAL MONDAL AND 1 OUTHER — 6313/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBNP150040482020
Filing Number
6313/2020
Filing Date
19-01-2026
Registration No
6313/2020
Registration Date
19-01-2026
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore, North 24 Pgs.
Judge
8-ACJM
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
370
Police Station
TITAGARH
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of West Bengal
Respondent(s)
GOPAL MONDAL AND 1 OUTHER
Hearing History
Judge: 8-ACJM
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore acquitted Gopal Mondal and Sampa Mondal of charges under IPC sections 341/323/506/34 (wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation). The sole prosecution witness, the defacto complainant Smt. Anjana Mondal, retracted her allegations stating she had no case against the accused and the dispute was settled. The court found vast discrepancies between the written complaint and trial testimony, lack of incriminating evidence, and the prosecution's failure to establish essential ingredients of the offences, rendering the case fundamentally weak. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore acquitted Gopal Mondal and Sampa Mondal of charges under IPC sections 341/323/506/34 (wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation). The sole prosecution witness, the defacto complainant Smt. Anjana Mondal, retracted her allegations stating she had no case against the accused and the dispute was settled. The court found vast discrepancies between the written complaint and trial testimony, lack of incriminating evidence, and the prosecution's failure to establish essential ingredients of the offences, rendering the case fundamentally weak. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts