State of West Bengal vs PALASH GHOSH AND 3 OTHERS — 10695/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.

Gr Case

CNR: WBNP150039502021

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

10695/2021

Filing Date

23-11-2023

Registration No

10695/2021

Registration Date

23-11-2023

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore, North 24 Pgs.

Judge

11-JM III

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

805

Police Station

KHARDAH

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 498A,406,34

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

PALASH GHOSH AND 3 OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: 11-JM III

01-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

SR/AD/Appearence

07-01-2025

SR/AD/Appearence

04-12-2023

SR/AD/Appearence

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Judgement

Case Summary The Third Court of the Judicial Magistrate at Barrackpore acquitted all four accused (Palash Ghosh, Papiya Ghosh, Paresh Ghosh, and Bijoli Ghosh) of charges under Section 498A IPC (cruelty to wife). The complainant, who was the sole prosecution witness, testified that the case was filed in a moment of anger over a minor misunderstanding that was subsequently resolved amicably, and she had no further accusations against the accused. The court found the prosecution failed to provide any credible evidence linking the accused to the alleged offense, rendering the allegations baseless and unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Third Court of the Judicial Magistrate at Barrackpore acquitted all four accused (Palash Ghosh, Papiya Ghosh, Paresh Ghosh, and Bijoli Ghosh) of charges under Section 498A IPC (cruelty to wife). The complainant, who was the sole prosecution witness, testified that the case was filed in a moment of anger over a minor misunderstanding that was subsequently resolved amicably, and she had no further accusations against the accused. The court found the prosecution failed to provide any credible evidence linking the accused to the alleged offense, rendering the allegations baseless and unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore, North 24 Pgs. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case