State of West Bengal vs PALASH GHOSH AND 3 OTHERS — 10695/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBNP150039502021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
10695/2021
Filing Date
23-11-2023
Registration No
10695/2021
Registration Date
23-11-2023
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore, North 24 Pgs.
Judge
11-JM III
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
805
Police Station
KHARDAH
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of West Bengal
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PALASH GHOSH AND 3 OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: 11-JM III
Disposed
SR/AD/Appearence
SR/AD/Appearence
SR/AD/Appearence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | SR/AD/Appearence | |
| 07-01-2025 | SR/AD/Appearence | |
| 04-12-2023 | SR/AD/Appearence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Third Court of the Judicial Magistrate at Barrackpore acquitted all four accused (Palash Ghosh, Papiya Ghosh, Paresh Ghosh, and Bijoli Ghosh) of charges under Section 498A IPC (cruelty to wife). The complainant, who was the sole prosecution witness, testified that the case was filed in a moment of anger over a minor misunderstanding that was subsequently resolved amicably, and she had no further accusations against the accused. The court found the prosecution failed to provide any credible evidence linking the accused to the alleged offense, rendering the allegations baseless and unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Third Court of the Judicial Magistrate at Barrackpore acquitted all four accused (Palash Ghosh, Papiya Ghosh, Paresh Ghosh, and Bijoli Ghosh) of charges under Section 498A IPC (cruelty to wife). The complainant, who was the sole prosecution witness, testified that the case was filed in a moment of anger over a minor misunderstanding that was subsequently resolved amicably, and she had no further accusations against the accused. The court found the prosecution failed to provide any credible evidence linking the accused to the alleged offense, rendering the allegations baseless and unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts