Madhusudan Nayak vs Krishnendu Datta — 915/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 10th September 2026.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 10-Sep-2026 in 4 days

Complaint Case

CNR: WBNP150030902025

Filing Number

3084/2025

Filing Date

27-Aug-2025

Registration No

915/2025

Registration Date

27-Aug-2025

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore, North 24 Pgs.

Judge

11-Jm III

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Madhusudan Nayak

    Adv. Sanjib Das

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Krishnendu Datta

Case History

  1. 10-Sep-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 915/2025 Summary The court found a prima facie case against accused Krishnendu Datta under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (dishonored cheque of Rs.15,00,000). Process was ordered to be issued against the accused. The accused is given an opportunity to compound the offense by depositing Rs.15,00,000 plus 7% interest from cheque issuance date and Rs.5,000 as costs by 10.09.2026, or face prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Jm III

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Examination of Sa

    Jm III

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Examination of Sa

    Jm III

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Examination of Sa

    Jm III

  7. 06-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 27-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 915/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 915/2025 Summary The court found a prima facie case against accused Krishnendu Datta under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (dishonored cheque of Rs.15,00,000). Process was ordered to be issued against the accused. The accused is given an opportunity to compound the offense by depositing Rs.15,00,000 plus 7% interest from cheque issuance date and Rs.5,000 as costs by 10.09.2026, or face prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case