GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL vs TAMAL KANTI CHOUDHURY OTHERS — 16136/2014

Status: Awaiting Order from Upper Court. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.

Awaiting Order from Upper Court Next hearing 03-Aug-2026 this date has passed

Gr Case

CNR: WBNP150008362009

Filing Number

25646/2014

Filing Date

06-Oct-2009

Registration No

16136/2014

Registration Date

06-Oct-2009

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore, North 24 Pgs.

Judge

10-Jm II

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TAMAL KANTI CHOUDHURY OTHERS

Case History

  1. 03-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Awaiting Order from Upper Court

    Jm II

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    Jm II

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: In G.R. 4189 of 2009, the court rejected the complainant's petition filed under Section 311 Cr.P.C. seeking recall of the complainant's own evidence and re-examination of a charge sheet witness (the first investigating officer) to establish the accused's nationality. The court found the petition constituted dilatory tactics and an attempt to fill prosecution's lacunas, noting the complainant had ample opportunity to raise these issues during the earlier trial phases but failed to do so. The case is fixed for argument and judgment on 24.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    Jm II

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    Jm II

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    Jm II

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    Jm II

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    Jm II

  10. 20-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  11. 20-Jan-2026

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    Jm II

  12. 06-Jan-2026

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    Jm II

  13. 06-Aug-2025

    Judgement

    Jm II

  14. 18-Mar-2025

    Judgement

    Jm II

  15. 11-Feb-2025

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    Jm II

  16. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Jm II

  17. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Jm II

  18. 27-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  19. 28-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  20. 26-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  21. 13-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  22. 28-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  23. 07-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  24. 20-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  25. 03-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  26. 20-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  27. 06-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  28. 06-May-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  29. 16-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  30. 28-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  31. 12-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  32. 15-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Jm II

  33. 30-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Jm II

  34. 28-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Jm II

  35. 15-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Jm II

  36. 30-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Jm II

  37. 16-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Jm II

  38. 28-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Jm II

  39. 22-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Jm II

  40. 25-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Jm II

  41. 30-Aug-2021

    Evidence

    Jm II

  42. 10-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    Jm II

  43. 22-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Jm II

  44. 12-Feb-2019

    Evidence

    Jm II

  45. 23-Feb-2018

    Evidence

    Jm II

  46. 18-Aug-2015

    Evidence

    Jm II

  47. 26-Sep-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 06-Oct-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16136/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In G.R. 4189 of 2009, the court rejected the complainant's petition filed under Section 311 Cr.P.C. seeking recall of the complainant's own evidence and re-examination of a charge sheet witness (the first investigating officer) to establish the accused's nationality. The court found the petition constituted dilatory tactics and an attempt to fill prosecution's lacunas, noting the complainant had ample opportunity to raise these issues during the earlier trial phases but failed to do so. The case is fixed for argument and judgment on 24.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case