State of West Bengal vs Banokumar sardar — 98/2022

Case under 7.indian Penal Code Section 363,365,376. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

POCSO CASE

CNR: WBNP100023952022

Evidence

Next Hearing

08th July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1629/2022

Filing Date

12-12-2022

Registration No

98/2022

Registration Date

12-12-2022

Court

Additional District Judge, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas

Judge

1-ADJ

FIR Details

FIR Number

290

Police Station

Nazat

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

7.Indian Penal Code Section 363,365,376
POCSO Section 4

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Adv. pp

Respondent(s)

Banokumar sardar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADJ

09-03-2026

Evidence

03-02-2026

Evidence

07-06-2025

Evidence

24-02-2025

Evidence

06-09-2024

Production

Interim Orders

12-12-2022
Order
24-01-2023
Order
19-06-2023
Order
14-08-2023
Order
02-02-2024
Order
11-03-2024
Order
30-08-2024
Order
04-09-2024
Order
06-09-2024
Order
06-09-2024
Order
24-02-2025
Order

Case Summary In Special Case No. 98 of 2022 (POCSO Act), the court adjourned the matter to 07.06.2025 for the appearance and evidence of Witness 2 (CSW 2). The accused Bonkumar Sardar was absent without steps, and the surety was directed to produce him on the next date. The court issued a detailed order criticizing the boycott by Basirhat Civil and Criminal Court Bar Association advocates and requested the District Magistrate and District Public Prosecutor to ensure state advocates participate in judicial proceedings to prevent obstruction of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Special Case No. 98 of 2022 (POCSO Act), the court adjourned the matter to 07.06.2025 for the appearance and evidence of Witness 2 (CSW 2). The accused Bonkumar Sardar was absent without steps, and the surety was directed to produce him on the next date. The court issued a detailed order criticizing the boycott by Basirhat Civil and Criminal Court Bar Association advocates and requested the District Magistrate and District Public Prosecutor to ensure state advocates participate in judicial proceedings to prevent obstruction of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District Judge, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case