State of West Bengal vs Nijam Molla — 61/2025

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules Section 8/12. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

POCSO CASE

CNR: WBNP100009282025

Filing Number

568/2025

Filing Date

25-Apr-2025

Registration No

61/2025

Registration Date

25-Apr-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas

Judge

1-ADJ

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

217

Police Station

HASNABAD

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules Section 8/12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nijam Molla

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    ADJ

  3. 04-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    ADJ

  4. 08-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    ADJ

  5. 05-Jun-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: POCSO(Spl) 61/2025 Bail application of accused Nijam Molla @ Nizamuddin Molla was GRANTED. The Special Court (POCSO Act) at Basirhat fixed bail at Rs. 3,000 with one surety of equal amount, noting that the charges (under sections 8/12 POCSO Act and 332(b)/351(s) BNS) do not attract death or life imprisonment and custodial detention appeared unnecessary. The accused must not tamper with witnesses and is directed to appear on 8/7/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 05-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    ADJ

  7. 22-May-2025

    Production

    ADJ

  8. 25-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: POCSO(Spl) 61/2025 Bail application of accused Nijam Molla @ Nizamuddin Molla was GRANTED. The Special Court (POCSO Act) at Basirhat fixed bail at Rs. 3,000 with one surety of equal amount, noting that the charges (under sections 8/12 POCSO Act and 332(b)/351(s) BNS) do not attract death or life imprisonment and custodial detention appeared unnecessary. The accused must not tamper with witnesses and is directed to appear on 8/7/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case