State of West Bengal vs Biplab Biswas Others — 599/2014

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 394 395 397. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: WBNP100006982013

Filing Number

6487/2014

Filing Date

29-Apr-2013

Registration No

599/2014

Registration Date

29-Apr-2013

Court

Additional District Judge, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas

Judge

2-ADJ Ftc I

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 394 395 397

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

    Adv. S T 8 (

  2. 2.2024 P.P Sri Goutam Banerjee

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Biplab Biswas Others

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ Ftc I

  3. 16-Feb-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    ADJ Ftc I

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    ADJ Ftc I

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    ADJ Ftc I

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  7. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  8. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  9. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  10. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  11. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  12. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  13. 06-Apr-2024

    OrderView PDF

    The court framed charges against five accused (Biplab Biwas, Kartick Bahadur, Bikash Sadhu, Sankar Dey, and Sanjoy Kundu) under IPC sections 394/395/397 (dacoity) arising from a 2011 police case, finding sufficient grounds to presume their guilt. All accused refused to plead guilty and claimed trial; the case is scheduled for witness examination starting October 3, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 06-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    ADJ Ftc I

  15. 08-Jun-2023

    OrderView PDF

  16. 08-Jun-2023

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ Ftc I

  17. 22-Feb-2023

    OrderView PDF

  18. 22-Feb-2023

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  19. 14-Dec-2022

    OrderView PDF

  20. 14-Dec-2022

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  21. 07-Sep-2022

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  22. 13-Jun-2022

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  23. 03-Mar-2022

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ Ftc I

  24. 09-Dec-2021

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  25. 11-Aug-2021

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  26. 11-May-2021

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  27. 19-Jan-2021

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  28. 21-Nov-2020

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  29. 16-Sep-2020

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  30. 31-Jul-2020

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  31. 14-May-2020

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  32. 21-Mar-2020

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  33. 16-Dec-2019

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  34. 23-Sep-2019

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  35. 20-Jun-2019

    Appointment of P.P.

    ADJ Ftc I

  36. 14-Dec-2018

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ Ftc I

  37. 21-Aug-2018

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ Ftc I

  38. 18-Apr-2018

    Production

    ADJ Ftc I

  39. 26-Mar-2018

    Appearance

    ADJ Ftc I

  40. 12-Feb-2018

    Appearance

    ADJ Ftc I

  41. 29-Jan-2018

    Appearance

    ADJ Ftc I

  42. 06-Dec-2017

    Appearance

    ADJ Ftc I

  43. 29-Nov-2017

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ Ftc I

  44. 13-Sep-2017

    Appearance

    ADJ Ftc I

  45. 04-Jul-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 29-Apr-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 599/2014

casestatus.in Summary

The court framed charges against five accused (Biplab Biwas, Kartick Bahadur, Bikash Sadhu, Sankar Dey, and Sanjoy Kundu) under IPC sections 394/395/397 (dacoity) arising from a 2011 police case, finding sufficient grounds to presume their guilt. All accused refused to plead guilty and claimed trial; the case is scheduled for witness examination starting October 3, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case