State of West Bengal vs Sagar Sardar — 23/2022

Case under 7.indian Penal Code Section 363,365,120B,376. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

POCSO CASE

CNR: WBNP100005502022

Evidence

Next Hearing

02nd July 2026

Filing Number

376/2022

Filing Date

29-03-2022

Registration No

23/2022

Registration Date

02-04-2022

Court

Additional District Judge, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas

Judge

1-ADJ

FIR Details

FIR Number

98

Police Station

Matia

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

7.Indian Penal Code Section 363,365,120B,376
POCSO Section 04,06

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Adv. P.P.yet not appeared

Respondent(s)

Sagar Sardar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADJ

02-06-2026

Evidence

27-04-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

16-02-2026

Evidence

14-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

27-09-2022
Order
21-03-2023
Order
21-03-2023
Order
21-03-2023
Order
10-10-2023
Order
16-01-2024
Order
29-01-2024
Order
30-01-2024
Order
31-01-2024
Order
27-02-2024
Order
27-02-2024
Order
29-02-2024
Order
10-09-2024
Order
12-09-2024
Order
03-01-2025
Order
05-03-2025
Order

Case 23/2022 Summary: In this Special POCSO case (Order No.58, dated 05.03.2025), the court adjourned proceedings to 21.04.2025 for appearance, production, and evidence. Accused Sagar Sardar declined to file a bail application and was produced via video conference, while co-accused Rojina Bibi appeared in person. The hearing could not proceed due to the Special Public Prosecutor's absence, no witness appearance, and no service returns received; the prosecution was directed to take necessary steps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

27-04-2026

Order

27-04-2026

Order

casestatus.in Summary

Case 23/2022 Summary: In this Special POCSO case (Order No.58, dated 05.03.2025), the court adjourned proceedings to 21.04.2025 for appearance, production, and evidence. Accused Sagar Sardar declined to file a bail application and was produced via video conference, while co-accused Rojina Bibi appeared in person. The hearing could not proceed due to the Special Public Prosecutor's absence, no witness appearance, and no service returns received; the prosecution was directed to take necessary steps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District Judge, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case