State of West Bengal vs Echanur Molla — 35/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),140(3),64(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 27-Jul-2026 this date has passed

POCSO CASE

CNR: WBNP100005292025

Filing Number

314/2025

Filing Date

10-Mar-2025

Registration No

35/2025

Registration Date

10-Mar-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas

Judge

1-ADJ

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

514

Police Station

SWARUPNAGAR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),140(3),64(2)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Echanur Molla

Case History

  1. 27-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    ADJ

  3. 01-Sep-2025

    Executionof W.A/Wpa

    ADJ

  4. 19-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

  5. 19-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: Bail granted to accused Echanur Molla@ Isnaur Molla in a POCSO Act case. The Special Court at Basirhat granted interim bail of Rs. 3,000 with one surety of equal amount, finding that further judicial custody was unnecessary as investigation was complete and there was no risk of witness tampering or evidence destruction. The accused must appear in court on 1/9/2025 and comply with conditions including regular court attendance and non-commission of similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 19-Jul-2025

    Executionof W.A/Wpa

    ADJ

  7. 17-May-2025

    Executionof W.A/Wpa

  8. 09-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Report

    ADJ

  9. 10-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 10-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Bail granted to accused Echanur Molla@ Isnaur Molla in a POCSO Act case. The Special Court at Basirhat granted interim bail of Rs. 3,000 with one surety of equal amount, finding that further judicial custody was unnecessary as investigation was complete and there was no risk of witness tampering or evidence destruction. The accused must appear in court on 1/9/2025 and comply with conditions including regular court attendance and non-commission of similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case