State of West Bengal vs abdulla khan — 20/2023
Case under Foreigners Act Section 14AB. Status: Executionof W.A/WPA. Next hearing: 19th January 2027.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBNP100000742023
Next Hearing
19th January 2027
Filing Number
53/2023
Filing Date
10-01-2023
Registration No
20/2023
Registration Date
10-01-2023
Court
Additional District Judge, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas
Judge
3-ADJ FTC II
FIR Details
FIR Number
4735
Police Station
SWARUPNAGAR
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of West Bengal
Adv. pp
Respondent(s)
abdulla khan
sandhina begum
sanjoy dhar
nazima khan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADJ FTC II
Executionof W.A/WPA
Charge / Plea Hearing
Charge / Plea Hearing
Executionof W.A/WPA
Charge / Plea Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Executionof W.A/WPA |
| 01-07-2025 | Charge / Plea Hearing |
| 10-09-2024 | Charge / Plea Hearing |
| 21-03-2024 | Executionof W.A/WPA |
| 01-03-2024 | Charge / Plea Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 20/2023 - State of West Bengal v. Abdulla Khan, Sandhina Begum, and Sanjoy Dhar The petition filed by accused Nazima Khan seeking return of a seized Oppo Mobile Phone was allowed. The court directed police to release the phone upon furnishing a jimma bond of Rs. 15,000, finding that over one month had elapsed since charge sheet submission and the device was no longer required for investigation. Additionally, the court modified attendance requirements for accused Nazima Khan from weekly to monthly appearances, citing satisfactory conduct and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 20/2023 - State of West Bengal v. Abdulla Khan, Sandhina Begum, and Sanjoy Dhar The petition filed by accused Nazima Khan seeking return of a seized Oppo Mobile Phone was allowed. The court directed police to release the phone upon furnishing a jimma bond of Rs. 15,000, finding that over one month had elapsed since charge sheet submission and the device was no longer required for investigation. Additionally, the court modified attendance requirements for accused Nazima Khan from weekly to monthly appearances, citing satisfactory conduct and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts