Govt. of West Bengal vs Dipali Das — 329/2024

Case under I.p.c(police) Section 498A,406,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

Gr Case

CNR: WBNP070003962024

Filing Number

396/2024

Filing Date

30-Jan-2024

Registration No

329/2024

Registration Date

30-Jan-2024

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bongaon, North 24 Parganas

Judge

5-Acjm

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

570

Police Station

GAIGHATA

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

I.p.c(police) Section 498A,406,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govt. of West Bengal

    Adv. Arnab Chatterjee

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dipali Das

  2. 2.Ashim Das

  3. 3.Purba Sarkar

  4. 4.Soumen Das

  5. 5.Biswajit Sarkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five accused persons (Dipali Das, Ashim Das, Purba Sarkar, Soumen Das, and Biswajit Sarkar) of charges under IPC sections 498A/406/34 (cruelty, criminal breach of trust). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness (informant/complainant) testified during examination-in-chief that she had lodged the case out of misunderstanding and had no allegations against the accused, with no corroborating evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    313 Cr.P.C., Argument and Judgement

    Acjm

  5. 06-Nov-2025

    313 Cr.P.C., Argument and Judgement

    Acjm

  6. 08-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 30-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 329/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five accused persons (Dipali Das, Ashim Das, Purba Sarkar, Soumen Das, and Biswajit Sarkar) of charges under IPC sections 498A/406/34 (cruelty, criminal breach of trust). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness (informant/complainant) testified during examination-in-chief that she had lodged the case out of misunderstanding and had no allegations against the accused, with no corroborating evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case