Govt. of West Bengal vs Dipali Das — 329/2024
Case under I.p.c(police) Section 498A,406,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 21st April 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBNP070003962024
Filing Number
396/2024
Filing Date
30-01-2024
Registration No
329/2024
Registration Date
30-01-2024
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bongaon, North 24 Parganas
Judge
5-ACJM
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
570
Police Station
GAIGHATA
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of West Bengal
Adv. Arnab Chatterjee
Respondent(s)
Dipali Das
Ashim Das
Purba Sarkar
Soumen Das
Biswajit Sarkar
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ACJM
Disposed
313 Cr.P.C., Argument and Judgement
313 Cr.P.C., Argument and Judgement
Execution of W.A/WPA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | 313 Cr.P.C., Argument and Judgement |
| 06-11-2025 | 313 Cr.P.C., Argument and Judgement |
| 08-02-2024 | Execution of W.A/WPA |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five accused persons (Dipali Das, Ashim Das, Purba Sarkar, Soumen Das, and Biswajit Sarkar) of charges under IPC sections 498A/406/34 (cruelty, criminal breach of trust). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness (informant/complainant) testified during examination-in-chief that she had lodged the case out of misunderstanding and had no allegations against the accused, with no corroborating evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five accused persons (Dipali Das, Ashim Das, Purba Sarkar, Soumen Das, and Biswajit Sarkar) of charges under IPC sections 498A/406/34 (cruelty, criminal breach of trust). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness (informant/complainant) testified during examination-in-chief that she had lodged the case out of misunderstanding and had no allegations against the accused, with no corroborating evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts