Govt. of West Bengal vs Chumki Ghosh Advocate - Subrata Biswas — 250/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Gr Case

CNR: WBNP070003772026

e-Filing Number

20-01-2026

Filing Number

377/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

250/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bongaon, North 24 Parganas

Judge

5-Acjm

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

214

Police Station

BONGAON

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govt. of West Bengal

    Adv. p p

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chumki Ghosh Advocate - Subrata Biswas

  2. 2.Chiranjit Ghosh

    Adv. Subrata Biswas

  3. 3.Sujit Ghosh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused persons—Chumki Ghosh, Chiranjit Ghosh, and Sujit Ghosh—finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The informant (PW-1) testified he could not recall why he filed the case and had no allegations against the accused, with all other prosecution witnesses corroborating this position, leaving no incriminating evidence on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 250/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused persons—Chumki Ghosh, Chiranjit Ghosh, and Sujit Ghosh—finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The informant (PW-1) testified he could not recall why he filed the case and had no allegations against the accused, with all other prosecution witnesses corroborating this position, leaving no incriminating evidence on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case