Sri Biplab Mallick vs Smt Taniya Mallick Barai — 716/2024
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13. Status: Cross Examinatiom of P.W.. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
Matrimonial Suit
CNR: WBNP060024382024
Filing Number
1126/2024
Filing Date
20-Nov-2024
Registration No
716/2024
Registration Date
20-Nov-2024
Court
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bongaon, North 24 Parganas
Judge
4-ADJ Ftc II
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sri Biplab Mallick
Adv. Tapash Biswas
Respondent(s)
-
1.Smt Taniya Mallick Barai
Case History
-
07-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The case (Mat 716 of 2024) was heard before the Additional District Judge at Bongaon on 08-04-2026. The court adjourned the case to 07-05-2026 for cross-examination of PW 1 (Prosecution Witness 1), with both petitioner and respondent present. The respondent's time petition for hearing was considered by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Cross Examinatiom of P.W.
ADJ Ftc II
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Cross Examinatiom of P.W.
ADJ Ftc II
-
04-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
Cross Examinatiom of P.W.
ADJ Ftc II
-
06-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
06-Nov-2025
Cross Examinatiom of P.W.
ADJ Ftc II
-
04-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
Order
ADJ Ftc II
-
26-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence
ADJ Ftc II
-
16-Jun-2025
OrderView PDF
-
16-Jun-2025
Reconciliation
ADJ Ftc II
-
02-May-2025
OrderView PDF
-
02-May-2025
Written Statement
ADJ Ftc II
-
13-Mar-2025
OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2025
Written Statement
ADJ Ftc II
-
12-Feb-2025
OrderView PDF
-
12-Feb-2025
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ Ftc II
-
20-Nov-2024
OrderView PDF
-
20-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 716/2024
The case (Mat 716 of 2024) was heard before the Additional District Judge at Bongaon on 08-04-2026. The court adjourned the case to 07-05-2026 for cross-examination of PW 1 (Prosecution Witness 1), with both petitioner and respondent present. The respondent's time petition for hearing was considered by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts