Govt. of West Bengal vs Rabeya Bashri — 324/2025
Case under Foreigners Act Section 14A(b),14C. Status: Charge / Plea Hearing. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBNP060021112025
Filing Number
1036/2025
Filing Date
10-Oct-2025
Registration No
324/2025
Registration Date
31-Oct-2025
Court
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bongaon, North 24 Parganas
Judge
4-ADJ Ftc II
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
676
Police Station
BAGDAH
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govt. of West Bengal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rabeya Bashri
-
2.Sumi Shaikh
-
3.Gaffar Mridha
Case History
-
15-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-May-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 324/2025 Summary: In this case before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bongaon (North 24 Parganas), the court adjourned proceedings on 13-05-2026. Two accused persons (Rabeya Bashri and Sumi Shaikh) were physically produced from jail with guilty petitions, while accused Gaffar Mridha remained absent on conditional bail by petition. The case was adjourned to 15-07-2026 for appearance, production, and framing of charges, with the Public Prosecutor taking no steps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
Charge / Plea Hearing
ADJ Ftc II
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Charge / Plea Hearing
ADJ Ftc II
-
19-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
19-Jan-2026
Charge / Plea Hearing
ADJ Ftc II
-
03-Dec-2025
OrderView PDF
-
03-Dec-2025
Charge / Plea Hearing
ADJ Ftc II
-
31-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 324/2025
Case 324/2025 Summary: In this case before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bongaon (North 24 Parganas), the court adjourned proceedings on 13-05-2026. Two accused persons (Rabeya Bashri and Sumi Shaikh) were physically produced from jail with guilty petitions, while accused Gaffar Mridha remained absent on conditional bail by petition. The case was adjourned to 15-07-2026 for appearance, production, and framing of charges, with the Public Prosecutor taking no steps. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts