Binita Das Sarkar vs Anup Das — 3/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21RII. Status: Payment/Further order. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
Mat Execution - Matrimonial Execution
CNR: WBNP060011142025
Filing Number
599/2025
Filing Date
06-Jun-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
06-Jun-2025
Court
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bongaon, North 24 Parganas
Judge
2-ADJ II
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Binita Das Sarkar
Adv. Surangit Guha
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anup Das
Case History
-
11-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary In this execution matter between Smt. Binita Das and Sri Anup Das, the court adjourned the case on 09/03/2026 due to a bar association strike regarding Bar Council elections, without passing adverse orders. On 10/04/2026, the respondent failed to appear and made no payment; the court directed him to appear personally on 11/05/2026 with further payment, warning that an adverse order will be passed in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Payment/Further order
ADJ II
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Payment/Further order
ADJ II
-
16-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
Payment/Further order
ADJ II
-
15-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
15-Jan-2026
Payment/Further order
ADJ II
-
03-Dec-2025
OrderView PDF
-
03-Dec-2025
Payment/Further order
ADJ II
-
02-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
-
02-Aug-2025
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ II
-
25-Jun-2025
OrderView PDF
-
25-Jun-2025
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ II
-
06-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2025
Case Summary In this execution matter between Smt. Binita Das and Sri Anup Das, the court adjourned the case on 09/03/2026 due to a bar association strike regarding Bar Council elections, without passing adverse orders. On 10/04/2026, the respondent failed to appear and made no payment; the court directed him to appear personally on 11/05/2026 with further payment, warning that an adverse order will be passed in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts