Rita Bhakta Biswas vs Neuton Vishwas — 223/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13. Status: Show cause by the petitioner. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Show cause by the petitioner Next hearing 13-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBNP060006582025

Filing Number

352/2025

Filing Date

01-Apr-2025

Registration No

223/2025

Registration Date

01-Apr-2025

Court

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bongaon, North 24 Parganas

Judge

2-ADJ II

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rita Bhakta Biswas

    Adv. Arindam Ahir

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Neuton Vishwas

Case History

  1. 13-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Show cause by the petitioner

    ADJ II

  3. 19-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 223/2025 Summary: In this matrimonial suit under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, petitioner Rita Bhakta Biswas failed to appear for the exparte hearing scheduled on 19/01/2026. The court directed her to file a show-cause by 16/03/2026 explaining why the case should not be dismissed for default. The case was adjourned pending her response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Show cause by the petitioner

    ADJ II

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Exparte Hearing

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    Exparte Hearing

    ADJ II

  9. 16-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

  10. 16-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    ADJ II

  11. 01-Apr-2025

    OrderView PDF

  12. 01-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 01-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 223/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 223/2025 Summary: In this matrimonial suit under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, petitioner Rita Bhakta Biswas failed to appear for the exparte hearing scheduled on 19/01/2026. The court directed her to file a show-cause by 16/03/2026 explaining why the case should not be dismissed for default. The case was adjourned pending her response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case