Mamata Aich Das vs Papan Aich — 15/2026

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EXPARTE on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBNP060000562026

Filing Number

30/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

15/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bongaon, North 24 Parganas

Judge

2-ADJ II

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EXPARTE

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mamata Aich Das

    Adv. Sajal Mondal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Papan Aich

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Mamata Aich Das v. Papan Aich (15/2026) The court granted an ex parte divorce decree under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, dissolving the marriage between Smt. Mamata Aich Das and Sri Papan Aich. The petitioner proved her case through unchallenged testimony that the respondent inflicted physical and mental torture, was an alcoholic, demanded dowry, and ultimately drove her out in November 2024, after the marriage in January 2017. The respondent failed to contest the suit, leading to the ex parte decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ II

  4. 15-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 15-May-2026

    Exparte Hearing

    ADJ II

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    ADJ II

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mamata Aich Das v. Papan Aich (15/2026) The court granted an ex parte divorce decree under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, dissolving the marriage between Smt. Mamata Aich Das and Sri Papan Aich. The petitioner proved her case through unchallenged testimony that the respondent inflicted physical and mental torture, was an alcoholic, demanded dowry, and ultimately drove her out in November 2024, after the marriage in January 2017. The respondent failed to contest the suit, leading to the ex parte decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case