HDFC Bank Limited vs Sanjoy Sinha — 681/2017
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 14th August 2026.
Complaint Case
CNR: WBNP050010732017
Filing Number
1073/2017
Filing Date
12-Dec-2016
Registration No
681/2017
Registration Date
12-Dec-2016
Court
Bidhanagar court Complex
Judge
2-Jm
Last updated 15-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HDFC Bank Limited
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sanjoy Sinha
Case History
-
14-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Jm
-
16-May-2025
Evidence
Jm
-
12-Feb-2024
Evidence
Jm
-
05-Dec-2023
Evidence
Jm
-
27-Sep-2023
Evidence
Jm
-
14-Aug-2023
Evidence
Jm
-
10-Feb-2023
Evidence
Jm
-
30-Aug-2022
E.R .W.a
Jm
-
19-May-2022
E.R .W.a
Jm
-
12-Apr-2022
Charge / Plea Hearing
Jm
-
08-Jul-2021
Charge / Plea Hearing
Jm
-
07-Jan-2021
Charge / Plea Hearing
Jm
-
27-Apr-2020
Charge / Plea Hearing
Jm
-
04-Nov-2019
Charge / Plea Hearing
Jm
-
08-Feb-2019
Charge / Plea Hearing
Jm
-
13-Aug-2018
orderView PDF
Summary: The substitution petition was allowed, replacing the authorized representative with Tarun Dutta. The court found a prima facie case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and issued summons to the accused to appear in court. The case is adjourned to 8.2.2019 for the accused's appearance and further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Aug-2018
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Jm
-
13-Jun-2018
Hearing
Jm
-
06-Mar-2018
Examination on Sa
Jm
-
10-Jan-2018
Examination on Sa
Jm
-
25-Aug-2017
Examination on Sa
Jm
-
01-Jul-2017
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Jm
-
17-Apr-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 681/2017
Summary: The substitution petition was allowed, replacing the authorized representative with Tarun Dutta. The court found a prima facie case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and issued summons to the accused to appear in court. The case is adjourned to 8.2.2019 for the accused's appearance and further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts