Bazlur Rahaman vs State of West Bengal — 3382/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 05th March 2026.
Bail
CNR: WBNP010099152025
Filing Number
5180/2025
Filing Date
13-Oct-2025
Registration No
3382/2025
Registration Date
13-Oct-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Barasat, North 24 Parganas
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
05-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 08-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bazlur Rahaman
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Sessions Court rejected Bazlur Rahaman's bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S in a case involving charges of fraud and practicing medicine without qualification (IPC §304/420/468/417). Despite arguments that he had been in custody since August 2020 and had fixed residence, the court found prima-facie serious allegations that he posed as a fake doctor endangering lives, and denied bail as the case was ready for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
23-Dec-2025
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
OrderView PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
27-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3382/2025
Summary: The Sessions Court rejected Bazlur Rahaman's bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S in a case involving charges of fraud and practicing medicine without qualification (IPC §304/420/468/417). Despite arguments that he had been in custody since August 2020 and had fixed residence, the court found prima-facie serious allegations that he posed as a fake doctor endangering lives, and denied bail as the case was ready for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts