Prasanta Paul vs Rupa Das — 441/2023

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBNP010021862023

Filing Number

1261/2023

Filing Date

01-Mar-2023

Registration No

441/2023

Registration Date

02-Mar-2023

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Barasat, North 24 Parganas

Judge

5-ADJ IV

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 08-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prasanta Paul

    Adv. S P Mukherjee

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rupa Das

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional District Judge dismissed Matrimonial Suit No. 441 of 2023 filed by Sri Prasanta Paul against Smt. Rupa Das for default on 05.03.2026. The petitioner failed to take any steps or file a show cause despite being directed to do so on a previous date (14.11.2025), and did not appear in court, leading the judge to conclude the petitioner had lost interest in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ IV

  4. 14-Nov-2025

    Show Cause

    ADJ IV

  5. 18-Jun-2025

    OrderView PDF

  6. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ IV

  7. 17-Apr-2025

    Reconciliation

    ADJ IV

  8. 25-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    ADJ IV

  9. 12-Dec-2024

    Requsites

    ADJ IV

  10. 01-Aug-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ IV

  11. 15-Feb-2024

    Requsites

    ADJ IV

  12. 04-Oct-2023

    Requsites

    ADJ IV

  13. 10-Apr-2023

    Steps

    ADJ IV

  14. 02-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 01-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 441/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Judge dismissed Matrimonial Suit No. 441 of 2023 filed by Sri Prasanta Paul against Smt. Rupa Das for default on 05.03.2026. The petitioner failed to take any steps or file a show cause despite being directed to do so on a previous date (14.11.2025), and did not appear in court, leading the judge to conclude the petitioner had lost interest in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case