State of West Bengal vs Javed — 485/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBNP010017972026

Filing Number

919/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

485/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Barasat, North 24 Parganas

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

Bidhan Nagar Cyber Crime

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Javed

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge rejected petitioner Javed's bail application in a cybercrime case involving alleged hotel booking fraud where Rs. 6 crores were fraudulently received. Despite acknowledging prolonged custody and incomplete bills/vouchers submitted by the accused claiming legitimate construction material business, the court found documentary evidence showed money was deposited for hotel bookings, indicating fraudulent activity. The bail was rejected citing risk of witness intimidation and evasion, particularly given the accused's previous arrest in another case and the earlier rejection of his bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 485/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge rejected petitioner Javed's bail application in a cybercrime case involving alleged hotel booking fraud where Rs. 6 crores were fraudulently received. Despite acknowledging prolonged custody and incomplete bills/vouchers submitted by the accused claiming legitimate construction material business, the court found documentary evidence showed money was deposited for hotel bookings, indicating fraudulent activity. The bail was rejected citing risk of witness intimidation and evasion, particularly given the accused's previous arrest in another case and the earlier rejection of his bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case