State of West Bengal vs Bibekananda Sarka alias Sonai alias Vivekananda Sarkar — 365/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBNP010013002026

Filing Number

678/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

365/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Barasat, North 24 Parganas

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

191

Police Station

SOUTH BIDHAN NAGAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bibekananda Sarka alias Sonai alias Vivekananda Sarkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of Bibekananda Sarka under Section 483 B.N.S.S, finding that the chargesheet had already been submitted and the case was ready for trial. The court held that based on settled principles for granting bail and the materials on record, the petitioner was not entitled to bail despite arguments of false implication and prolonged custody since November 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 365/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of Bibekananda Sarka under Section 483 B.N.S.S, finding that the chargesheet had already been submitted and the case was ready for trial. The court held that based on settled principles for granting bail and the materials on record, the petitioner was not entitled to bail despite arguments of false implication and prolonged custody since November 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case