State of West Bengal vs Samrat Box Mondal — 316/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBNP010010772026

Filing Number

575/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

316/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Barasat, North 24 Parganas

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

40

Police Station

SWARUPNAGAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Samrat Box Mondal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Samrat Box Mondal in a case involving charges under BNS sections 318(4)/303(2)/317(2) and the Elections Act. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary since the petitioner had already complied with notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS and seizure had been completed. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 5,000 bond with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses and evidence, and appearance before the lower court within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 316/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Samrat Box Mondal in a case involving charges under BNS sections 318(4)/303(2)/317(2) and the Elections Act. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary since the petitioner had already complied with notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS and seizure had been completed. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 5,000 bond with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses and evidence, and appearance before the lower court within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case