State of West Bengal vs Bipul Adhikary — 244/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBNP010008432026

Filing Number

468/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

244/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Barasat, North 24 Parganas

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 08-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bipul Adhikary

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Bipul Adhikary, Ashok Adhikary, and Prosenjit Mondal in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 118(2), 351(2), and 3(5). The court found that injury reports showed no serious deterioration of the victim's condition, the victim was treated as an outpatient, investigation was nearly complete, and custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The accused were granted bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with sureties, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses and appearance before the jurisdictional court within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 244/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to Bipul Adhikary, Ashok Adhikary, and Prosenjit Mondal in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 118(2), 351(2), and 3(5). The court found that injury reports showed no serious deterioration of the victim's condition, the victim was treated as an outpatient, investigation was nearly complete, and custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The accused were granted bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with sureties, subject to conditions including non-interference with witnesses and appearance before the jurisdictional court within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case