Kalyan Krishna Nandi vs Nita Nandi (Mani) — 7/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,399. Status: Hearing of Petition. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.

Hearing of Petition Next hearing 22-May-2026 this date has passed

Criminal Revision

CNR: WBNP010002352025

Filing Number

140/2025

Filing Date

07-Jan-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

07-Jan-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Barasat, North 24 Parganas

Judge

3-ADJ II

Last updated 08-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,399

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kalyan Krishna Nandi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nita Nandi (Mani)

Case History

  1. 22-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ II

  3. 05-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Criminal Revision No. 07 of 2025 - The case has been adjourned to 05.03.2026 for hearing of the revision petition. The revisionist's plea for adjournment (due to BLO duties under Special Incentive Revision) and the opposite party's adjournment prayer were both allowed. The revisionist is directed to serve relevant documents to O.P. No.1 before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-Jan-2026

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ II

  5. 19-Sep-2025

    OrderView PDF

  6. 19-Sep-2025

    Hearing of Appeal

    ADJ II

  7. 10-Jul-2025

    Lcr

    ADJ II

  8. 25-Apr-2025

    OrderView PDF

  9. 25-Apr-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ II

  10. 07-Mar-2025

    OrderView PDF

  11. 07-Mar-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ II

  12. 07-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 07-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Criminal Revision No. 07 of 2025 - The case has been adjourned to 05.03.2026 for hearing of the revision petition. The revisionist's plea for adjournment (due to BLO duties under Special Incentive Revision) and the opposite party's adjournment prayer were both allowed. The revisionist is directed to serve relevant documents to O.P. No.1 before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case