Paramita Karmakar Guha Sarkar vs Dipankar Guha Sarkar — 626/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Misc Crl Case - Misc Criminal Case

CNR: WBND130049732024

Evidence

Next Hearing

07th July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4973/2024

Filing Date

25-11-2024

Registration No

626/2024

Registration Date

25-11-2024

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranaghat, Nadia

Judge

7-JM II

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

Paramita Karmakar Guha Sarkar

Adv. UTTAM BHATTACHERJEE

Respondent(s)

Dipankar Guha Sarkar

Hearing History

Judge: 7-JM II

10-03-2026

Evidence

16-10-2025

Evidence

10-09-2025

Hearing

04-06-2025

Hearing

05-02-2025

Written Objection

Interim Orders

05-02-2025
Order
04-06-2025
Order
16-10-2025
Order

Summary: The interim maintenance petition filed by Paramita Karmakar Guha Sarkar against her husband Dipankar Guha Sarkar was allowed in part. The court granted interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month (instead of the claimed Rs. 20,000), payable from the date of application filing (25.11.2024), with payments due by the 10th of each month. The court found the petitioner to be a legally married wife with no independent income, the husband capable of providing maintenance despite disputed income figures, and thus entitled to interim relief pending final determination of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The interim maintenance petition filed by Paramita Karmakar Guha Sarkar against her husband Dipankar Guha Sarkar was allowed in part. The court granted interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000 per month (instead of the claimed Rs. 20,000), payable from the date of application filing (25.11.2024), with payments due by the 10th of each month. The court found the petitioner to be a legally married wife with no independent income, the husband capable of providing maintenance despite disputed income figures, and thus entitled to interim relief pending final determination of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranaghat, Nadia All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case