STATE vs Samaresh Ghosh and 06 others — 675/2016

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 448,341,323,325,354B,427,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

Gr Case

CNR: WBND130030422016

Filing Number

675/2016

Filing Date

18-Apr-2016

Registration No

675/2016

Registration Date

18-Apr-2016

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranaghat, Nadia

Judge

4-Acjm

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 04-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

110

Police Station

DHANTALA

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 448,341,323,325,354B,427,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Samaresh Ghosh and 06 others

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Court Summary Case: GR Case No. 675 of 2016, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranaghat, Nadia (20 March 2026) Decision: All six accused persons (Samaresh Ghosh, Suman Ghosh, Rahul Ghosh, Bapi Ghosh, Indrajit Ghosh, and Deba Ghosh) were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 448/341/325/354B/427/506/34. The court found significant contradictions and loopholes in the prosecution's evidence, including conflicting witness testimonies about the place of occurrence, the complainant's own admission of not witnessing the assault, and the failure of a key prosecution witness to support the case, ruling that guilt was not proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    Acjm

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    Acjm

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    Acjm

  8. 28-Nov-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    Acjm

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    Acjm

  10. 20-Aug-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    Acjm

  11. 24-Jul-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    Acjm

  12. 25-Feb-2025

    Argument / Further Argument

    Acjm

  13. 25-Sep-2024

    VakilpatraView PDF

  14. 25-Sep-2024

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    Acjm

  15. 03-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm

  16. 02-Feb-2024

    OrderView PDF

  17. 02-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 17-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 29-May-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 14-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 25-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 22-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Acjm

  23. 19-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Acjm

  24. 28-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Acjm

  25. 24-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Acjm

  26. 31-Aug-2021

    Evidence

    Acjm

  27. 04-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Acjm

  28. 17-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Acjm

  29. 19-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Acjm

  30. 29-May-2020

    Evidence

    Acjm

  31. 29-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Acjm

  32. 16-Dec-2019

    Evidence

    Acjm

  33. 27-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Acjm

  34. 30-May-2019

    Evidence

    Acjm

  35. 11-Mar-2019

    Evidence

    Acjm

  36. 09-Jan-2019

    Evidence

    Acjm

  37. 02-Nov-2018

    Evidence

    Acjm

  38. 23-Aug-2018

    Evidence

    Acjm

  39. 10-Aug-2018

    Charge

    Acjm

  40. 11-Jul-2018

    Appearance

    Acjm

  41. 18-Apr-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 18-Apr-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 675/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary Case: GR Case No. 675 of 2016, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranaghat, Nadia (20 March 2026) Decision: All six accused persons (Samaresh Ghosh, Suman Ghosh, Rahul Ghosh, Bapi Ghosh, Indrajit Ghosh, and Deba Ghosh) were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 448/341/325/354B/427/506/34. The court found significant contradictions and loopholes in the prosecution's evidence, including conflicting witness testimonies about the place of occurrence, the complainant's own admission of not witnessing the assault, and the failure of a key prosecution witness to support the case, ruling that guilt was not proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case