STATE vs Ajoy Das — 765/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Gr Case

CNR: WBND130013412024

Filing Number

1341/2024

Filing Date

14-Mar-2024

Registration No

765/2024

Registration Date

14-Mar-2024

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranaghat, Nadia

Judge

4-Acjm

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 04-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

423

Police Station

SANTIPUR

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ajoy Das

  2. 2.Sujoy Das

  3. 3.Bijoy Das

  4. 4.Pradip Das

  5. 5.Shipra Das

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Ranaghat, Nadia acquitted all five accused persons (Ajay Das, Sujoy Das, Bijoy Das, Pradip Das, and Shipra Das) of charges under Section 498A IPC (cruelty by husband/relatives) on March 10, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish any ingredients of the alleged offense, the complainant could not corroborate her written complaint during testimony, and no facts were proved consistent with guilt and inconsistent with innocence beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  5. 09-Sep-2025

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    Acjm

  6. 27-Aug-2025

    Put Up

    Acjm

  7. 13-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 14-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 765/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Ranaghat, Nadia acquitted all five accused persons (Ajay Das, Sujoy Das, Bijoy Das, Pradip Das, and Shipra Das) of charges under Section 498A IPC (cruelty by husband/relatives) on March 10, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish any ingredients of the alleged offense, the complainant could not corroborate her written complaint during testimony, and no facts were proved consistent with guilt and inconsistent with innocence beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case