Kiran Paul vs Sushmita Paul nee Karmakar — 33/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440, 442. Disposed: Contested--TRANSFER on 05th January 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision

CNR: WBND110014462024

Filing Number

395/2024

Filing Date

12-Aug-2024

Registration No

33/2024

Registration Date

12-Aug-2024

Court

Additional District Judge, Ranaghat, Nadia

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

05-Jan-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--TRANSFER

Last updated 04-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440, 442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kiran Paul

    Adv. BASUDEB MUKHOPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sushmita Paul nee Karmakar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jan-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ

  3. 05-Jan-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 27-Aug-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ

  5. 23-Apr-2025

    Lcr

    ADJ

  6. 24-Mar-2025

    Lcr

    ADJ

  7. 18-Dec-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ

  8. 02-Sep-2024

    judgmentView PDF

    The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ranaghat partially allowed the revisionist's stay petition challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs. 15,000/month, reducing it to Rs. 10,000/month, finding the original amount exorbitant given the revisionist's insufficient income and obligations to elderly parents. The court noted the case's trial has not commenced and the revisionist's actual maintenance capacity remains to be determined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 02-Sep-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    ADJ

  10. 12-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 12-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ranaghat partially allowed the revisionist's stay petition challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs. 15,000/month, reducing it to Rs. 10,000/month, finding the original amount exorbitant given the revisionist's insufficient income and obligations to elderly parents. The court noted the case's trial has not commenced and the revisionist's actual maintenance capacity remains to be determined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case