Sapiya Khatun vs Bapan Ali Sk — 177/2023

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Order. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.

Order Next hearing 21-May-2026 this date has passed

Mr Maintenance - MR case for Maintenance

CNR: WBND090032082023

Filing Number

3208/2023

Filing Date

17-Oct-2023

Registration No

177/2023

Registration Date

17-Oct-2023

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tehatta

Judge

6-Acjm

Last updated 04-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sapiya Khatun

    Adv. JAHANGIR ALAM MONDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bapan Ali Sk

Case History

  1. 21-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    Acjm

  3. 23-Jan-2026

    Order

    Acjm

  4. 17-Dec-2025

    Order

    Acjm

  5. 23-Jul-2025

    Order

    Acjm

  6. 26-Jun-2025

    Order

    Acjm

  7. 22-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Acjm

  8. 20-Dec-2024

    Written.Statement

    Acjm

  9. 31-Jul-2024

    Written.Statement

  10. 16-Apr-2024

    Written.Statement

    Acjm

  11. 16-Feb-2024

    Written.Statement

    Acjm

  12. 02-Feb-2024

    OrderView PDF

    In case MR 177 of 2023, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the petition filed by the opposite party (OP) and adjourned the matter to 16-04-2024 for written statement (WS). The petitioner was present and the opposing petition with vakalatnama was considered, resulting in the court granting the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 02-Feb-2024

    Written.Statement

    Acjm

  14. 09-Jan-2024

    OrderView PDF

  15. 09-Jan-2024

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Acjm

  16. 17-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 17-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 177/2023

casestatus.in Summary

In case MR 177 of 2023, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the petition filed by the opposite party (OP) and adjourned the matter to 16-04-2024 for written statement (WS). The petitioner was present and the opposing petition with vakalatnama was considered, resulting in the court granting the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case