Arpita Halder vs Kuntal Halder — 118/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 128. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 10th March 2026.
Misc. Execution Case
CNR: WBND090014892024
Filing Number
1490/2024
Filing Date
20-Jun-2024
Registration No
118/2024
Registration Date
20-Jun-2024
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tehatta
Judge
6-Acjm
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Last updated 04-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Arpita Halder
Adv. KUNTAL BHATTACHARYYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kuntal Halder
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The ACJM Tehatta court dismissed Misc Execution Case No. 118/2024 due to the petitioner's persistent absence and failure to file a show cause petition despite previous warnings and opportunities. The court found that the petitioner's non-appearance and inaction indicated unwillingness to proceed, warranting dismissal under procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
27-Jan-2026
Show Cause
Acjm
-
03-Nov-2025
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
28-Aug-2025
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
16-Apr-2025
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
04-Mar-2025
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
27-Dec-2024
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
18-Oct-2024
Executionof W.A/Wpa
Acjm
-
12-Sep-2024
Payment
Acjm
-
26-Jul-2024
Payment
Acjm
-
20-Jun-2024
OrderView PDF
-
20-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 118/2024
The ACJM Tehatta court dismissed Misc Execution Case No. 118/2024 due to the petitioner's persistent absence and failure to file a show cause petition despite previous warnings and opportunities. The court found that the petitioner's non-appearance and inaction indicated unwillingness to proceed, warranting dismissal under procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts