Arpita Halder vs Kuntal Halder — 118/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 128. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 10th March 2026.
Misc. Execution Case
CNR: WBND090014892024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1490/2024
Filing Date
20-06-2024
Registration No
118/2024
Registration Date
20-06-2024
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tehatta
Judge
6-ACJM
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arpita Halder
Adv. KUNTAL BHATTACHARYYA
Respondent(s)
Kuntal Halder
Hearing History
Judge: 6-ACJM
Disposed
Show Cause
Executionof W.A/WPA
Executionof W.A/WPA
Executionof W.A/WPA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-01-2026 | Show Cause | |
| 03-11-2025 | Executionof W.A/WPA | |
| 28-08-2025 | Executionof W.A/WPA | |
| 16-04-2025 | Executionof W.A/WPA |
Final Orders / Judgements
The ACJM Tehatta court dismissed Misc Execution Case No. 118/2024 due to the petitioner's persistent absence and failure to file a show cause petition despite previous warnings and opportunities. The court found that the petitioner's non-appearance and inaction indicated unwillingness to proceed, warranting dismissal under procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The ACJM Tehatta court dismissed Misc Execution Case No. 118/2024 due to the petitioner's persistent absence and failure to file a show cause petition despite previous warnings and opportunities. The court found that the petitioner's non-appearance and inaction indicated unwillingness to proceed, warranting dismissal under procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts