Chaina Biswas vs Prabir Biswas — 49/2023
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Awaiting Report. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
Misc Crl Case - Misc Criminal Case
CNR: WBND090011792023
Filing Number
1179/2023
Filing Date
28-Apr-2023
Registration No
49/2023
Registration Date
28-Apr-2023
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tehatta
Judge
7-Jm
Last updated 04-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chaina Biswas
Adv. PRANABESH JOARDER
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prabir Biswas
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Mar-2026
Awaiting Report
Jm
-
28-Nov-2025
Awaiting Report
Jm
-
26-Aug-2025
Awaiting Report
Jm
-
13-May-2025
Awaiting Report
Jm
-
09-May-2025
Awaiting Report
Jm
-
07-Dec-2024
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate at Tehatta, Nadia rejected the petitioner's application for interim maintenance of Rs. 20,000 per month under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found discrepancies in the petitioner's claims, including a 14-year delay in filing after the alleged 2009 incident and inconsistencies regarding her current residence, which raised doubts about the credibility of her averments. The case is fixed for Domestic Incident Report and evidence proceedings, with the petitioner required to file necessary documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Dec-2024
Awaiting Report
Jm
-
25-Nov-2024
Show Cause
Jm
-
19-Sep-2024
Show Cause
Jm
-
12-Jul-2024
Show Cause
Jm
-
15-Mar-2024
Show Cause
Jm
-
17-Feb-2024
Show Cause
Jm
-
11-Oct-2023
OrderView PDF
-
11-Oct-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Jm
-
17-Jun-2023
OrderView PDF
-
17-Jun-2023
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Jm
-
28-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 49/2023
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate at Tehatta, Nadia rejected the petitioner's application for interim maintenance of Rs. 20,000 per month under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found discrepancies in the petitioner's claims, including a 14-year delay in filing after the alleged 2009 incident and inconsistencies regarding her current residence, which raised doubts about the credibility of her averments. The case is fixed for Domestic Incident Report and evidence proceedings, with the petitioner required to file necessary documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts