Tanima Mondal Roy vs N.A — 100/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Divorce On Mutual Consent - Matri Suit Divorce Mutual Cons

CNR: WBND080006542025

Filing Number

247/2025

Filing Date

30-Jul-2025

Registration No

100/2025

Registration Date

30-Jul-2025

Court

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tehetta

Judge

2-ADJ

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tanima Mondal Roy

    Adv. SANTU BISWAS

  2. 2.Ujjwal Roy

    Adv. RAKTIM BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.N.A

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional District Judge, Tehatta granted a mutual consent divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, dissolving the marriage between Tanima Mondal (Roy) and Ujjwal Roy solemnized on 24.02.2023. The court found no impediment to the decree as the parties had been living separately since 21.05.2023, had no chance of reconciliation, and confirmed the absence of collusion and mutual claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  5. 30-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District Judge, Tehatta granted a mutual consent divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, dissolving the marriage between Tanima Mondal (Roy) and Ujjwal Roy solemnized on 24.02.2023. The court found no impediment to the decree as the parties had been living separately since 21.05.2023, had no chance of reconciliation, and confirmed the absence of collusion and mutual claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case