Hasibul Sk alias Hasibul Shaikh vs State Government of West Bengal — 50/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBND080001502026

Filing Number

111/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

50/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tehetta

Judge

2-ADJ

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 04-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hasibul Sk alias Hasibul Shaikh

    Adv. PRANABESH JOARDER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Tehatta, Nadia rejected the anticipatory bail application of Hasibul Sk, accused of domestic violence, dowry harassment, and offenses under POCSO Act and Child Marriage Prohibition Act. The court found the allegations serious—involving physical and mental torture of a pregnant victim, severe assault resulting in miscarriage, and attempted murder—and determined that medical documents and witness statements supported denying bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 50/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Tehatta, Nadia rejected the anticipatory bail application of Hasibul Sk, accused of domestic violence, dowry harassment, and offenses under POCSO Act and Child Marriage Prohibition Act. The court found the allegations serious—involving physical and mental torture of a pregnant victim, severe assault resulting in miscarriage, and attempted murder—and determined that medical documents and witness statements supported denying bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case