INSPECTOR IN CHARGE (IC), NABADWIP PS vs Pintu Mondal Advocate - CHANDRIKA SEN — 335/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 39. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

NGR Case

CNR: WBND060011802025

Filing Number

1177/2025

Filing Date

19-Sep-2025

Registration No

335/2025

Registration Date

19-Sep-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate, Nabadwip

Judge

2-Jm

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED

Last updated 04-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 39
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 292

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR IN CHARGE (IC), NABADWIP PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pintu Mondal Advocate - CHANDRIKA SEN

  2. 2.Buddhadev Nath

    Adv. CHANDRIKA SEN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment / Final OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court convicted three accused persons—Pintu Mondal, Budhadeb Nath, and Swarup Laha—under Sections 39 B.N.S.S and 292 B.N.S after they voluntarily pleaded guilty. Each was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 150, with a default provision of 7 days simple imprisonment. In a separate order, the court directed Nabadwip Police Station to submit pending investigation reports by 09/07/2026, noting the case had been stuck at the same stage due to non-receipt of necessary documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 19-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 335/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court convicted three accused persons—Pintu Mondal, Budhadeb Nath, and Swarup Laha—under Sections 39 B.N.S.S and 292 B.N.S after they voluntarily pleaded guilty. Each was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 150, with a default provision of 7 days simple imprisonment. In a separate order, the court directed Nabadwip Police Station to submit pending investigation reports by 09/07/2026, noting the case had been stuck at the same stage due to non-receipt of necessary documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case