Mangar Sarkar vs The State of West Bengal — 573/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBND010012682026

Filing Number

887/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

573/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Krishnanagar, Nadia

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 04-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

89

Police Station

KRISHNAGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mangar Sarkar

    Adv. SAYANTAN CHOWDHURY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Crl. Misc. Case final orderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to all four petitioners (Mangal Sarkar, Parbhati Sarkar, Alo Sarkar, and Priya Sarkar) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 329(3), 115(2), 118(2), 324(4), 352, and 3(5), finding no need for custodial interrogation. The petitioners must surrender within seven days and furnish bail of Rs. 3,000 with two sureties of Rs. 1,500 each, with the lead petitioner required to meet the investigating officer twice weekly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 573/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to all four petitioners (Mangal Sarkar, Parbhati Sarkar, Alo Sarkar, and Priya Sarkar) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 329(3), 115(2), 118(2), 324(4), 352, and 3(5), finding no need for custodial interrogation. The petitioners must surrender within seven days and furnish bail of Rs. 3,000 with two sureties of Rs. 1,500 each, with the lead petitioner required to meet the investigating officer twice weekly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case