Kartick Das vs The State of West Bengal — 459/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed in part on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBND010010002026

Filing Number

710/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

459/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Krishnanagar, Nadia

Judge

3-ADJ II

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed in part

Last updated 04-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

181

Police Station

KOTWALI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kartick Das

    Adv. SAYANTAN CHOWDHURY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected anticipatory bail for principal accused Kartick Das in a POCSO Act case involving a 17-year-old victim, finding sufficient materials for his involvement and deeming custodial interrogation necessary for investigation. However, the court granted pre-arrest bail to four other accused (Tapas Das, Susanta Das, Rekha Das, and Swagata Biswas) on Rs. 4,000 bail each with sureties, as no direct allegations were found against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ II

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 459/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected anticipatory bail for principal accused Kartick Das in a POCSO Act case involving a 17-year-old victim, finding sufficient materials for his involvement and deeming custodial interrogation necessary for investigation. However, the court granted pre-arrest bail to four other accused (Tapas Das, Susanta Das, Rekha Das, and Swagata Biswas) on Rs. 4,000 bail each with sureties, as no direct allegations were found against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case