Sukanta Biswas vs The State of West Bengal — 326/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBND010007032026

Filing Number

518/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

326/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Krishnanagar, Nadia

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 04-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

496

Police Station

HANSKHALI

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sukanta Biswas

    Adv. KAJAL GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Crl. Misc. Case final orderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons (Sukanta Biswas, Sangita Biswas, Bimal Biswas, and Anima Biswas) in a land dispute case involving assault charges under BNS sections 329(4), 115(2), and 117(2). The judge found no justification for custodial interrogation since investigation was complete and the charge sheet had been submitted, despite allegations of outraging female modesty lacking corroborating evidence. Each accused was granted bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 4,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 326/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons (Sukanta Biswas, Sangita Biswas, Bimal Biswas, and Anima Biswas) in a land dispute case involving assault charges under BNS sections 329(4), 115(2), and 117(2). The judge found no justification for custodial interrogation since investigation was complete and the charge sheet had been submitted, despite allegations of outraging female modesty lacking corroborating evidence. Each accused was granted bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 4,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case