The State of West Bengal vs Bapan Ghosh aliyas Ghentu — 88/2026

Case under Anusandhan National Research Foundation Act Section 109,115(2),117(2),3(5). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 08-May-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: WBND010003732026

Filing Number

287/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

88/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Krishnanagar, Nadia

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 04-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

457

Police Station

NAKASHIPARA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Anusandhan National Research Foundation Act Section 109,115(2),117(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bapan Ghosh aliyas Ghentu

  2. 2.Apu Ghosh@Biswarup Ghosh

  3. 3.Binoy Ghosh

Case History

  1. 08-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: Bail was granted to three accused persons (Binay Ghosh, Bapan Ghosh @ Ghentu Ghosh, and Apu Ghosh @ Biswarup Ghosh) who surrendered before the Sessions Court, Nadia on 10-03-2026. Each accused must furnish a bond of Rs. 4,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,000 each (other than previous sureties) and appear physically on each court date. The court noted this was a case of misuse of liberty as the accused had previously absconded on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    District Judge

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Put Up

    District Judge

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Bail was granted to three accused persons (Binay Ghosh, Bapan Ghosh @ Ghentu Ghosh, and Apu Ghosh @ Biswarup Ghosh) who surrendered before the Sessions Court, Nadia on 10-03-2026. Each accused must furnish a bond of Rs. 4,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,000 each (other than previous sureties) and appear physically on each court date. The court noted this was a case of misuse of liberty as the accused had previously absconded on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case