Manoj Kumar Bharti vs Subhadra Jain alias Neha Devi Advocate - Kheyali Majumder — 107/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBML050006512025

Filing Number

125/2025

Filing Date

04-Aug-2025

Registration No

107/2025

Registration Date

04-Aug-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Chanchal, Malda

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manoj Kumar Bharti

    Adv. Prasenjit roy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subhadra Jain alias Neha Devi Advocate - Kheyali Majumder

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 107/2025 Summary The Additional District Judge, Chanchal, Malda granted a mutual divorce decree dissolving the marriage of Manoj Kumar Bharti and Subhadra Jain (alias Neha Devi) under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court found the marriage irretrievably broken, as both petitioners testified that after separating on 03-12-2019 following temperamental incompatibility and frequent quarrels, they mutually agreed to dissolve their marriage with no prospect of reconciliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ

  7. 13-Nov-2025

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ

  8. 04-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 04-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 107/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 107/2025 Summary The Additional District Judge, Chanchal, Malda granted a mutual divorce decree dissolving the marriage of Manoj Kumar Bharti and Subhadra Jain (alias Neha Devi) under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court found the marriage irretrievably broken, as both petitioners testified that after separating on 03-12-2019 following temperamental incompatibility and frequent quarrels, they mutually agreed to dissolve their marriage with no prospect of reconciliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case