State of West Bengal vs Ansarul Ali Advocate - Saukat Ali — 158/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,80. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th April 2026.
Bail
CNR: WBML050002762026
Filing Number
235/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
158/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Additional District Judge, Chanchal, Malda
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
106
Police Station
CHANCHAL
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of West Bengal
Adv. Chinmoy Mishra
Respondent(s)
Ansarul Ali Advocate - Saukat Ali
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Disposed
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
| 13-04-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
| 06-04-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
| 30-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge, Chanchal, Malda rejected the bail petition of accused Ansarul Ali under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with charges under Sections 85/80 of BNS. The court denied bail considering the nature and gravity of the offence and because investigation was still ongoing, despite the accused's counsel arguing prolonged detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge, Chanchal, Malda rejected the bail petition of accused Ansarul Ali under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with charges under Sections 85/80 of BNS. The court denied bail considering the nature and gravity of the offence and because investigation was still ongoing, despite the accused's counsel arguing prolonged detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts