State of West Bengal vs Ansarul Ali Advocate - Saukat Ali — 158/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,80. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th April 2026.
Bail
CNR: WBML050002762026
Filing Number
235/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
158/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Additional District Judge, Chanchal, Malda
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
106
Police Station
CHANCHAL
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Adv. Chinmoy Mishra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ansarul Ali Advocate - Saukat Ali
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge, Chanchal, Malda rejected the bail petition of accused Ansarul Ali under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with charges under Sections 85/80 of BNS. The court denied bail considering the nature and gravity of the offence and because investigation was still ongoing, despite the accused's counsel arguing prolonged detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
ADJ
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
ADJ
-
13-Apr-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
ADJ
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
ADJ
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
ADJ
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
ADJ
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 158/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge, Chanchal, Malda rejected the bail petition of accused Ansarul Ali under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with charges under Sections 85/80 of BNS. The court denied bail considering the nature and gravity of the offence and because investigation was still ongoing, despite the accused's counsel arguing prolonged detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts