Tapasi Sarkar vs Goutam Pal Advocate - Surajit Pandey — 33/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBML050002252025

Filing Number

39/2025

Filing Date

13-Mar-2025

Registration No

33/2025

Registration Date

13-Mar-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Chanchal, Malda

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tapasi Sarkar

    Adv. Bodhisatya Chowdhury

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Goutam Pal Advocate - Surajit Pandey

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary - Matrimonial Suit No. 33/2025 The Additional District Judge, Chanchal, Malda granted a mutual divorce decree under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Tapasi Sarkar and Goutam Pal, married on 27-04-2020, separated on 22-09-2022 due to incompatibility and irreconcilable differences. Both parties testified under oath corroborating their joint petition, and the court found the marriage irretrievably broken, making it a fit case for dissolution on mutual consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 12-May-2026

    Order

    ADJ

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ

  7. 06-Dec-2025

    Reconciliation

    ADJ

  8. 29-Aug-2025

    Reconciliation

    ADJ

  9. 13-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 13-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - Matrimonial Suit No. 33/2025 The Additional District Judge, Chanchal, Malda granted a mutual divorce decree under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Tapasi Sarkar and Goutam Pal, married on 27-04-2020, separated on 22-09-2022 due to incompatibility and irreconcilable differences. Both parties testified under oath corroborating their joint petition, and the court found the marriage irretrievably broken, making it a fit case for dissolution on mutual consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case