State of West Bengal vs Rintu Kaibarta Advocate - Rajib Ghosh — 64/2022

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Section 6. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 14th May 2026.

Special Court Cases

CNR: WBML050000402022

Case disposed

Filing Number

64/2022

Filing Date

28-07-2022

Registration No

64/2022

Registration Date

03-01-2024

Court

Additional District Judge, Chanchal, Malda

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

14th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Adv. Special PP

Respondent(s)

Rintu Kaibarta Advocate - Rajib Ghosh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADJ

14-05-2026

Disposed

06-05-2026

Argument / Further Argument

18-04-2026

Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

16-03-2026

Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

03-02-2026

Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

Final Orders / Judgements

14-05-2026
Copy of Order
14-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Rintu Kaibarta (Case 64/2022) The Special Court in Chanchal, Malda acquitted Rintu Kaibarta of charges under Section 6 of the POCSO Act (aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a minor). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that neither the alleged survivor nor her mother corroborated the written complaint during trial testimony. The survivor denied giving any prior statement to the magistrate and could not recall whether she received medical examination, while independent witnesses were declared hostile and provided no supporting evidence. The court determined the complaint appeared motivated by a land dispute between the complainant and the accused's father rather than genuine sexual assault allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Rintu Kaibarta (Case 64/2022) The Special Court in Chanchal, Malda acquitted Rintu Kaibarta of charges under Section 6 of the POCSO Act (aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a minor). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that neither the alleged survivor nor her mother corroborated the written complaint during trial testimony. The survivor denied giving any prior statement to the magistrate and could not recall whether she received medical examination, while independent witnesses were declared hostile and provided no supporting evidence. The court determined the complaint appeared motivated by a land dispute between the complainant and the accused's father rather than genuine sexual assault allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District Judge, Chanchal, Malda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case