State of West Bengal vs Rintu Kaibarta Advocate - Rajib Ghosh — 64/2022
Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Section 6. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 14th May 2026.
Special Court Cases
CNR: WBML050000402022
Filing Number
64/2022
Filing Date
28-07-2022
Registration No
64/2022
Registration Date
03-01-2024
Court
Additional District Judge, Chanchal, Malda
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of West Bengal
Adv. Special PP
Respondent(s)
Rintu Kaibarta Advocate - Rajib Ghosh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Disposed
Argument / Further Argument
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
| 18-04-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C |
| 16-03-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C |
| 03-02-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Rintu Kaibarta (Case 64/2022) The Special Court in Chanchal, Malda acquitted Rintu Kaibarta of charges under Section 6 of the POCSO Act (aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a minor). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that neither the alleged survivor nor her mother corroborated the written complaint during trial testimony. The survivor denied giving any prior statement to the magistrate and could not recall whether she received medical examination, while independent witnesses were declared hostile and provided no supporting evidence. The court determined the complaint appeared motivated by a land dispute between the complainant and the accused's father rather than genuine sexual assault allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Rintu Kaibarta (Case 64/2022) The Special Court in Chanchal, Malda acquitted Rintu Kaibarta of charges under Section 6 of the POCSO Act (aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a minor). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that neither the alleged survivor nor her mother corroborated the written complaint during trial testimony. The survivor denied giving any prior statement to the magistrate and could not recall whether she received medical examination, while independent witnesses were declared hostile and provided no supporting evidence. The court determined the complaint appeared motivated by a land dispute between the complainant and the accused's father rather than genuine sexual assault allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts