State of West Bengal vs Munni Bibi Advocate - Smt Tapasi Saha — 34/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,399. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th April 2026.

Criminal Revision

CNR: WBML010037262025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2917/2025

Filing Date

21-07-2025

Registration No

34/2025

Registration Date

21-07-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 397,399

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Adv. Asit Baran Basu

Respondent(s)

Munni Bibi Advocate - Smt Tapasi Saha

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

24-04-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Argument / Further Argument

13-02-2026

Hearing of Petition

16-01-2026

Hearing of Petition

28-11-2025

Hearing of Petition

Final Orders / Judgements

24-04-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Sessions Judge rejected a wife's application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking to revise a maintenance dismissal order dated 19.04.2023. The court found no bona fide delay excuse, noting she had constructive knowledge of the dismissal through regular court appearances for maintenance collection until July 2025, yet waited over 5 months to apply for certified copy. The court held she acted in bad faith by filing this revision instead of pursuing the alternate remedy (restoration application) suggested by the trial court on 12.03.2024, and directed her to file a separate restoration application before the trial court within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

21-07-2025
Copy of Order
10-09-2025
Copy of Order
28-11-2025
Copy of Order
13-02-2026
Copy of Order
11-03-2026
Copy of Order
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge rejected a wife's application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking to revise a maintenance dismissal order dated 19.04.2023. The court found no bona fide delay excuse, noting she had constructive knowledge of the dismissal through regular court appearances for maintenance collection until July 2025, yet waited over 5 months to apply for certified copy. The court held she acted in bad faith by filing this revision instead of pursuing the alternate remedy (restoration application) suggested by the trial court on 12.03.2024, and directed her to file a separate restoration application before the trial court within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case