State of West Bengal vs Ratan Roy and another Advocate - Md. Naser Ali — 146/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,324,325,308,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 31st March 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: WBML010028032024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2049/2024

Filing Date

06-05-2024

Registration No

146/2024

Registration Date

06-05-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda

Judge

5-ADJ FTC I

Decision Date

31st March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

94

Police Station

GAZOLE

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 341,324,325,308,34

Petitioner(s)

State of West Bengal

Adv. A.P.P, Malda

Respondent(s)

Ratan Roy and another Advocate - Md. Naser Ali

Joydeb Sardar

Adv. Nilanjan Sarkar

Hearing History

Judge: 5-ADJ FTC I

31-03-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

Judgement

24-03-2026

Argument / Further Argument

07-03-2026

Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

06-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

Interim Orders

06-05-2024
Copy of Order
21-05-2024
Copy of Order
21-11-2024
Copy of Order
20-01-2025
Copy of Order
05-04-2025
Copy of Order
03-05-2025
Copy of Order
04-07-2025
Copy of Order
30-07-2025
Copy of Order
07-08-2025
Copy of Order
08-08-2025
Copy of Order
13-11-2025
Copy of Order
14-11-2025
Copy of Order
29-01-2026
Copy of Order
30-01-2026
Copy of Order
05-03-2026
Copy of Order
07-03-2026
Copy of Order
06-03-2026
Copy of Order
24-03-2026
Copy of Order
30-03-2026
Copy of Order
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Malda acquitted accused Ratan Roy and Joydeb Sardar of charges under Sections 341/325/308/34 IPC, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the victim (PW4) admitted to suffering head injuries from a fall during an altercation with intoxicated individuals, his testimony contained no direct evidence identifying the accused as his assailants, and this contradiction with other witnesses' accounts rendered the prosecution's evidence insufficient and lacking credibility to warrant conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case