SRI TARIT BHUIMALI vs JHUMPA BHUIMALI — 207/2024
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 27th April 2026.
Matrimonial Suit
CNR: WBML010020792024
Filing Number
434/2024
Filing Date
01-Apr-2024
Registration No
207/2024
Registration Date
01-Apr-2024
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malda
Judge
4-ADJ III
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI TARIT BHUIMALI
Adv. SAMIUL SK.
Respondent(s)
-
1.JHUMPA BHUIMALI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Additional District Judge, Malda, granted the petitioner husband Tarit Bhuimali's application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for restitution of conjugal rights. The court found that the respondent wife Jhumpa Bhuimali willfully withdrew herself from the matrimonial home without reasonable cause, and the petitioner's uncontested evidence established his claims of her desertion and mental cruelty. The respondent is directed to return to the matrimonial home within 3 months, failing which the decree may be executed according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Disposed
ADJ III
-
11-Mar-2026
Order
ADJ III
-
30-Jan-2026
Order
ADJ III
-
03-Nov-2025
Ex parte hearing
ADJ III
-
05-Aug-2025
Ex parte hearing
ADJ III
-
13-Jun-2025
Ex parte hearing
ADJ III
-
12-Mar-2025
Ex parte hearing
ADJ III
-
20-Nov-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ III
-
19-Aug-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ III
-
19-Jun-2024
Sr/Ad/Appearence
ADJ III
-
01-Apr-2024
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
01-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 207/2024
Summary The Additional District Judge, Malda, granted the petitioner husband Tarit Bhuimali's application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for restitution of conjugal rights. The court found that the respondent wife Jhumpa Bhuimali willfully withdrew herself from the matrimonial home without reasonable cause, and the petitioner's uncontested evidence established his claims of her desertion and mental cruelty. The respondent is directed to return to the matrimonial home within 3 months, failing which the decree may be executed according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts