State of West Bengal vs Biplab Mondal and 03 others Advocate - Palash Sarkar — 88/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),304(B),34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBML010017222024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1261/2024
Filing Date
13-03-2024
Registration No
88/2024
Registration Date
13-03-2024
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malda
Judge
5-ADJ FTC I
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
160
Police Station
BAMONGOLA
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of West Bengal
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Biplab Mondal and 03 others Advocate - Palash Sarkar
Promotha Mondal @ Pramoth Mondal
Bhedi Mondal
Gour Mondal @ Gono Mondal
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ADJ FTC I
Disposed
Judgement
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 17-03-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C | |
| 07-03-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C | |
| 31-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Interim Orders
Summary: In Sessions Case No. 88 of 2024, the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-1, Malda acquitted all four accused persons (Biplab Mondal, Promoth Mondal, Bhedi Mondal, and Gour Mondal) of charges under sections 498A/304B/34 IPC. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish any evidence against the accused despite examining ten witnesses; most witnesses (except the complainant, priest, and autopsy surgeon) turned hostile, and the complainant himself admitted during cross-examination that he did not compose the written complaint and that the accused persons did not demand dowry. The court accordingly directed their acquittal and release from bail bonds under section 232 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts