State of West Bengal vs Md. Matibur Sk. and another Advocate - Debanjan Dutta — 682/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,126(2),118(2),109,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBML010012762026

Filing Number

997/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

682/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1058

Police Station

KALIACHAWK

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,126(2),118(2),109,3(5)
Arms Act Section 25(1-B),(a),27/29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

    Adv. Asit Baran Basu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Md. Matibur Sk. and another Advocate - Debanjan Dutta

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 682/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge, Malda granted anticipatory bail to accused-petitioners Md. Matibur Sk and Md. Matiur Sk in a group fight case involving allegations under BNS sections and the Arms Act. The court found no justification for custodial interrogation, noting that co-accused had already been enlarged on anticipatory bail and the chargesheet was filed. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds each with two sureties of Rs. 5,000 each, subject to compliance with BNSS provisions and surrender before the appropriate court within a fortnight. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 682/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 682/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge, Malda granted anticipatory bail to accused-petitioners Md. Matibur Sk and Md. Matiur Sk in a group fight case involving allegations under BNS sections and the Arms Act. The court found no justification for custodial interrogation, noting that co-accused had already been enlarged on anticipatory bail and the chargesheet was filed. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds each with two sureties of Rs. 5,000 each, subject to compliance with BNSS provisions and surrender before the appropriate court within a fortnight. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case