State of West Bengal vs Babul Sk. alias babul Sekh alias Bablu Sk. Alias Takla Advocate - SK Afaulla — 680/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),109,111(2),(b),111(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail

CNR: WBML010012742026

Filing Number

995/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

680/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malda

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1072

Police Station

KALIACHAWK

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),109,111(2),(b),111(3),3(5)
Arms Act Section 25(1-B)(a),27/29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

    Adv. Asit Baran Basu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Babul Sk. alias babul Sekh alias Bablu Sk. Alias Takla Advocate - SK Afaulla

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge, Malda granted bail to accused Babul Sk in a dacoity with firearms case, finding that he had been in custody for a substantial period (since 02.02.2026) with no effective purpose served by continued detention, particularly since co-accused persons had already been enlarged on bail. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of Rs. 5,000 each, with one surety being local. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 680/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge, Malda granted bail to accused Babul Sk in a dacoity with firearms case, finding that he had been in custody for a substantial period (since 02.02.2026) with no effective purpose served by continued detention, particularly since co-accused persons had already been enlarged on bail. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of Rs. 5,000 each, with one surety being local. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case